It’s Not Just Mitt Rmoney (sic)

Paul Krugman points out that in America the demonstrable rise in economic inequality is combining with decreased social and economic mobility across classes to cause a rise in the number of adult children of powerful people who assume powerful positions themselves.

I suppose if America lasts long enough, it might reinvent the British class system.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • MandT  On Thursday January 26, 2012 at 2:45 pm

    It’s always existed, particularly in Virginia.

    • Steve  On Thursday January 26, 2012 at 5:09 pm

      Well, yes, MandT, it always has, and Virginia’s upper-crust is about the snootiest we’ve got… I hate to credit Rita Mae Brown with anything after she turned her characters into Tea Party dogmatists, but her fiction often depicts the class fault-lines in Virginia.

      Still, in many places in America, it has been possible for people of lower means to rise to well-earned prominence either as leaders or as creators (authors, scientists, philosophers, etc.)… but that ability seems to be vanishing in the face of a concerted effort by the self-anointed upper class to make not just their wealth but their position hereditary. Inherited wealth is probably inevitable; inherited position and/or status is un-American.

Leave a Reply (NB: I'm not responsible for any ad!)

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: