Gawd, The Man Can Speak!

Obama, I mean. Robert Reich provides us an annotated guide to the president’s speech yesterday in Osawatomie, Kansas (I love the name of that place!). Reich says, and I agree, that Obama hits all the right notes about the erosion of the middle class in America during and since the Reagan years. The speech is magnificently written; I haven’t heard the recording, but if Obama does one thing well, it’s to deliver a speech, and I presume he did.

The problem, of course, is that Obama governs differently from what he says in his stump speeches.

He mentioned the “raging debate” in America over how to restore “balance and fairness,” and even went so far as to mention both the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street (a first ever, I believe, though he did not use the name but instead circumlocuted). He spoke of the declining ability of the erstwhile middle class in America to raise a family, to own a home without risking personal financial catastrophe, to retain a decent-paying job working for a business that hasn’t offshored the work yet, and so on. Reich fills in some important details, but basically credits Obama with a right answer on this issue.

Obama does engage in politics: he criticizes those who suffer “amnesia” in wanting to return to the very same policies that caused our current train wreck… of course, a wholly honest assessment would have had him speaking of those who continue to pursue those very same policies, unchecked by his administration, because at least Wall Street and the banksters have never stopped those dishonest practices.

He alludes several times to Teddy Roosevelt and his New Nationalism, quoting TR quite amusingly:

“Our country,” he said, “…means nothing unless it means the triumph of a real democracy…of an economic system under which each man shall be guaranteed the opportunity to show the best that there is in him.”

Oh, really, Mr. President? Do you think you have given the best that there is in you in behalf of that “real democracy”? Many of us aren’t so sure.

He draws the obligatory parallel between TR in his time and Obama in his own time, and talks about the obligations of corporations to provide workers income that does not result in gross inequality of financial status. Again… am I really hearing this from Obama?

And so on, and so forth. I at least was left with one burning question in my mind: Why does Obama not govern the way he talks? Is he an opportunistic liar spewing whatever the people want to hear in every stump speech? Is he incompetent to lead, to accomplish the changes he rightly says we need? Does he genuinely believe all this stuff, but when confronted with the reality of massive opposition from corporate America, which pays the political bills, simply backs off from his struggle on behalf of working Americans?

I would offer that the answer is “none of the above.” Rather, Obama is one of those unfortunates among extremely intelligent people (and I do not doubt his intelligence) who are able to hold two or more completely contradictory sets of ideas, or policies, or even goals, in his mind simultaneously, without mentally choking on the cognitive dissonance.

If that is the case, then he is a dangerous man to have in the Oval Office.

I’d almost rather think he was too damned dumb to see what he is facilitating. But I don’t. He’s smart. And I’d rather have a different, less internally conflicted smart person… I’m not yet sure just who… as president in these troubled times.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • karmanot  On Wednesday December 7, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    The point about cognitive dissonance with intelligent people is a good point, but not when dealing with matters of power and empire. There, what is real or projected as reality (propaganda) is not the same as the truth. Obama is a liar, a manipulator, and worse —-a serial murderer, whose prose and cult of personality is fascism in its purest corporate form.

    • Steve  On Wednesday December 7, 2011 at 10:58 pm

      karmanot, all except the “serial murderer” label says only that he’s an old-style Chicago pol… and some of them were murderers as well. I wish I could think better of Obama, but his disingenuous mimicry of progressive coloration leaves me coldly angry. I cannot vote for this man, and I really wanted the Democratic Party to offer a president I could vote for. Not this time: Obama has consistently gone far outside the bounds of the constitutional role of the president, and not just in matters of fighting terrorism. No way could I vote for him now; once was once too often.

  • upyernoz  On Thursday December 8, 2011 at 8:08 am

    i’m hoping that obama might start governing more like he talks in the upcoming election year.

    that’s what happened to our now-former senator specter. he was a terrible senator, one of those so-called moderate republicans who the press slobbered all over but (despite the fact that he was allegedly 50% liberal) never actually voted the right way on anything. then pat toomey was going to kick his ass in the GOP primary, so specter jumped ship and became a democrat. then representative joe sestak started to kick specter’s ass in the polls for the democratic primary. and all of a sudden, specter turned into a fairly liberal senator (at least for the few months before sestak beat him in the primary, and then lost to toomey in the general).

    even without a serious primary challenge on obama, this is a potentially difficult election for him. so i’m excited to see which constituents he starts catering to. if he’s smart it will be people like me, and not the people who believe he is a black supremacist muslim satanist who was born in kenya.

    on the other hand, the early signs do not look good. but i still think he will throw the left a few bones in the next year. it might not be perfect, but hey, a bone!

    • Steve  On Thursday December 8, 2011 at 9:17 am

      ‘noz, skipping directly to your last paragraph and link, I have to remind everyone that an 11-year-old girl is either pregnant or she’s not; there’s no “not perfect” checkbox on this one. Obama has seemed willing at least, perhaps even enthusiastic, about helping the religious fundamentalists carve large holes in a woman’s right to choose abortion; why should this be any different. If time permits, I may post on this today; thanks for the link.

      Full disclosure: my very first contract programming job was for the local Planned Parenthood (now part of Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast), working on their political mailing list s/w, so I am far from objective on this issue.

Leave a Reply (NB: I'm not responsible for any ad!)

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: